VS · TUBESCIENCENewForm comparisonUPDATED NOVEMBER 3, 2026

NewForm vs TubeScience

Decide how you want to pay for creative and who will own the testing. A performance-linked fee and a scoped production engagement allocate cost differently; compare them against the same acquisition goal.

Publisher disclosure: NewForm sells the services and software discussed here. We reviewed the linked public provider material on November 3, 2026. Fit recommendations are our editorial judgment; we have not run a controlled head-to-head performance test.

N
NewForm
Editorial team
Last reviewed November 3, 2026

TL;DR

  • →TubeScience advertises performance-based creative pricing, studio production, media buying and its own creative intelligence tools.
  • →NewForm fits teams that want strategy and in-house production connected through Framework, with the option to use Framework independently with their existing team.
  • →Decide how you want to pay for creative and who will own the testing. A performance-linked fee and a scoped production engagement allocate cost differently; compare them against the same acquisition goal.

At a glance

PUBLISHER · TRANSPARENT COMPARISON

NewForm

Creative strategy, in-house production and testing

Pricing
Custom scope and quote. Agree concepts, variations, production formats, usage rights and media buying responsibilities before kickoff.
Best for
NewForm fits teams that want strategy and in-house production connected through Framework, with the option to use Framework independently with their existing team.
COMPETITOR

TubeScience

Performance-priced creative production

Pricing
Advertises pay-for-performance creative. Request the fee calculation, qualifying targets and full terms.
Best for
Advertisers evaluating a creative partner whose fees are tied to agreed performance targets.
Compare the fit for your workflow

Feature-by-feature

How the workflows compare.

FeatureNewFormTubeScienceEdge
Commercial modelCustom scope and quote for strategy, production and testing.Advertises pay-for-performance creative. Request the fee calculation, qualifying targets and full terms.SourceFit
Who runs the testsAgree campaign ownership and any media buying in the engagement.Describes client-run testing as well as a media buying service; specify which you are purchasing.SourceFit
Creative intelligenceFramework informs production and is also available as standalone software.Builds internal creative intelligence and production technology.SourceFit

Which one should I pick?

Which workflow fits your team?

Pick NewForm if
  • ✓You want an engagement that specifies new concepts, variations and production responsibilities up front.
  • ✓You want to evaluate Framework separately before deciding whether to change your production partner.
  • ✓NewForm's relevant work and sample briefs fit the product demonstrations your customers need.
Pick TubeScience if
  • ✓You prefer performance-linked creative fees and can agree a measurable target and testing process.
  • ✓You want to evaluate production and media buying from the same provider.
  • ✓Its proposal explains the costs and operating requirements clearly enough for your team to execute.

Compare the same test under both pricing models

Give each team a target acquisition cost, your conversion event, current ads and the budget available for learning. Ask for a first-batch plan that distinguishes a new concept from an edit of an existing one.

Then model a batch with no qualifying ads, one with a small winner and one that scales. Include creative fees, media spend, management, creator rights and internal review time. A performance-linked creative fee does not remove the cost of running the test.

  • Which attribution window determines whether an ad qualifies?
  • Who funds tests and decides when there is enough evidence?
  • What fees and usage rights apply when an ad keeps running?

What to confirm before choosing

The public pricing description is not a complete contract. Ask how targets, attribution, testing spend, fees and creative usage are defined.

The verdict

Our recommendation.

Shortlist TubeScience if the performance-linked proposal works for your economics. Shortlist NewForm if you want scoped production tied to Framework or want to start with software for your existing team. Both deserve a review of actual work and operating terms.

Neither a pricing model nor a large output count proves which partner will acquire better customers for your business. Judge the brief, testing plan and total commitment together.

Frequently asked

Questions about the comparison.

Does TubeScience charge a standard monthly retainer?
Its public site advertises performance-based creative pricing. Ask for the applicable proposal rather than assuming a conventional retainer or treating the headline as a complete price list.
Can I use Framework without switching to NewForm production?
Yes. Framework is available as standalone software for your current team or agency. Full-service NewForm is a separate engagement; compare the cost and responsibilities of each option.
How should I compare the agencies' results?
Request comparable examples for your business model, including the time period, conversion event, spend and attribution method. Evaluate a scoped first batch against your own baseline. Past client results do not establish a result for your account.
CLOSINGGet startedREPLY WITHIN 24H

Find the right team for your next creative program.

End of fileNewForm · 2026